If Ambedkar Were Alive Today, He Would Remorse Over the Parliament's State of Affairs

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, the principal architect of the Indian Constitution, envisioned the Parliament as the cornerstone of democracy—a temple of debate, reason, and progress. It was meant to be a place where diverse voices converge to deliberate and shape the future of the nation. However, if Ambedkar were alive today, he would likely be disheartened by the current state of affairs in the Indian Parliament.

The recent adjournment of parliamentary proceedings over a remark made by Home Minister Amit Shah about Dr. Ambedkar is a glaring example of how the sanctity of this institution is being compromised. Instead of addressing pressing national issues, debates are increasingly being replaced by disruptions and walkouts. Important discussions are stalled, and the legislative agenda remains unfulfilled. This trend has now become a "fashionable" practice, eroding the fundamental purpose of the Parliament.

The Cost of Stalled Proceedings

Every adjournment and disruption come at a cost—not just monetary but also in terms of governance. The common people, who place their trust in elected representatives, expect enlightened debates on policies that impact their lives. They do not expect the Parliament to degenerate into a battleground of dirty quarrels and blame games.

The stalling of the House hampers the interests of the people. Bills remain pending, crucial issues such as inflation, unemployment, and national security are sidelined, and the voice of the people is drowned in the chaos. What Ambedkar envisioned as a platform for dialogue has increasingly become a theatre of performative outrage.

Parliament as a Reflection of a Nation

The Parliament is not just a legislative body; it is a mirror of a nation’s values, culture, and societal maturity. When the highest institution of democracy is marred by petty squabbles and disorderly conduct, it tarnishes the image of the country on the global stage. International observers often judge the strength of a democracy by the functioning of its legislature. Disruptions, therefore, do not merely affect the nation internally but also diminish its stature worldwide.

The Need for Change

This practice of stalling the regular schedule of the House must stop. Parliamentarians need to rise above party politics and personal egos to prioritize the nation's interests. Constructive debates, respectful disagreements, and a focus on issues that matter to the common man should define the proceedings. The true tribute to Ambedkar would be to uphold the dignity and purpose of the Parliament, ensuring it functions as the vibrant nucleus of India’s democracy.

Ambedkar’s vision of democracy was one rooted in reasoned dialogue and mutual respect. The current state of the Parliament, with its frequent disruptions and adjournments, stands in stark contrast to that vision. It is time for parliamentarians to introspect and honor the responsibility entrusted to them by the people. Only then can the Parliament truly serve as the beacon of democracy thatAmbedkar dreamed of.